Excluded Heirs May Still Inherit
When Elizabeth was born out
of wedlock in the 1950s, she
was adopted soon afterwards by
another family. As a young adult, she
located her birth mother and formed
a long lasting relationship with her.
Elizabeth also discovered that, through
her mother, she was related to the
beneficiaries of a large fortune. Two
multimillion dollar trusts had been
established to provide income to
Elizabeth’s mother during her lifetime.
The remaining principal was to go to
her "descendants," according to one
trust, and to "each then living child
of hers," according to the other trust.
Following a long battle, a court has
found that Elizabeth is entitled to share
in the fortune, notwithstanding the
argument by her mother’s other heirs
that she was not her mother’s "child" or
"descendant" because she had been
adopted out of the family. Looking at
the applicable state law when the trusts
were created, the court determined
that, at such times, nonmarital children
could be included as descendants or
children of their biological parents for
purposes of inheritance. There also
was an overarching constitutional
issue, as some courts have held that
treating children born out of a marriage
differently from marital children is a
denial of equal protection of the law.
In Elizabeth’s case, the issue would
have been more clear cut in her favor
had the trust instruments simply
included her as a beneficiary, either
by more inclusive language or by
using her name. Of course, up to a
point, the creator of a trust or will has
leeway in deciding which of his or her
children to include as beneficiaries.
But the law has been known to step
in on behalf of children to achieve
a measure of justice and fairness.
A case in point, which has yet to play
out to a resolution, concerns the estate
of Anna Nicole Smith. In her will, Smith
left all of her estate, which could be
greatly enhanced by many millions
of dollars from her late husband’s
assets, to her son. Only months before
both Smith and her son died, she
gave birth to a daughter. Whether the
omission of any future children from
Smith’s will was intentional or merely
a drafting error, it is probable that
Smith’s daughter will inherit the estate.
Under the "omitted child" doctrine
followed by a majority of courts, when a parent has a will and then has
children, those children are treated as if
they were born prior to the will, and they
are afforded the same treatment as any
other siblings. If, for whatever reason, the
Smith estate passes outside of the will, the
daughter still will likely receive the estate.
Update Your Estate Planning Documents
Your estate planning documents should
be reviewed with a professional
on a regular basis and kept
current with your life changes.
Birth, death, marriage, and divorce
are but a few life changes that
can significantly affect your estate
planning. Don’t wait until it’s too
late to revise your plans to reflect
your wishes and circumstances.

|